On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, George Spelvin wrote: > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > After thinking more about it, I'm even more sure that any code which > > relies on the FIFO "guarantee" is broken today. > > Indeed, I am completely convinced. All I might request is a reassignment > of blame in the commit message.
Will do. Thanks for spotting it! > Thank you for your comments on my other blue-sky ideas, too. > > I need to look into why we're using wheels, and what the point is. > How much of an advantage do they have over an efficient priority queue > like a pairing heap? The only reason is performance. The wheel has O(1) insertion and deletion time while heaps and trees usually have O(log(n)). Timer wheel timers are usually timeouts and 99% of them are canceled before expiry. Networking is probably the heaviest use case followed by disk I/O. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/