Second parameter of find_new_reaper() and the similarity of its name
and find_child_reaper()'s name confuse a reader.

Rename find_child_reaper() for better conformity of its name and its
function. Also delete the second parameter of find_new_reaper().

These both improve modularity.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktk...@odin.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
---
 kernel/exit.c |   24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 22fcc05..ae60a4d 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static struct task_struct *find_alive_thread(struct 
task_struct *p)
        return NULL;
 }
 
-static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
+static void exit_pidns_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
        __releases(&tasklist_lock)
        __acquires(&tasklist_lock)
 {
@@ -458,12 +458,12 @@ static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct 
task_struct *father)
        struct task_struct *reaper = pid_ns->child_reaper;
 
        if (likely(reaper != father))
-               return reaper;
+               return;
 
        reaper = find_alive_thread(father);
        if (reaper) {
                pid_ns->child_reaper = reaper;
-               return reaper;
+               return;
        }
 
        write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -473,8 +473,6 @@ static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct 
task_struct *father)
        }
        zap_pid_ns_processes(pid_ns);
        write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
-
-       return father;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -484,15 +482,21 @@ static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct 
task_struct *father)
  *    child_subreaper for its children (like a service manager)
  * 3. give it to the init process (PID 1) in our pid namespace
  */
-static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father,
-                                          struct task_struct *child_reaper)
+static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
 {
-       struct task_struct *thread, *reaper;
+       struct task_struct *thread, *reaper, *child_reaper;
 
        thread = find_alive_thread(father);
        if (thread)
                return thread;
 
+       child_reaper = task_active_pid_ns(father)->child_reaper;
+       /*
+        * child_reaper doesn't have children after zap_pid_ns_processes(),
+        * therefore it can't enter this function.
+        */
+       BUG_ON(child_reaper == father);
+
        if (father->signal->has_child_subreaper) {
                /*
                 * Find the first ->is_child_subreaper ancestor in our pid_ns.
@@ -557,11 +561,11 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struct task_struct 
*father,
                exit_ptrace(father, dead);
 
        /* Can drop and reacquire tasklist_lock */
-       reaper = find_child_reaper(father);
+       exit_pidns_child_reaper(father);
        if (list_empty(&father->children))
                return;
 
-       reaper = find_new_reaper(father, reaper);
+       reaper = find_new_reaper(father);
        list_for_each_entry(p, &father->children, sibling) {
                for_each_thread(p, t) {
                        t->real_parent = reaper;



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to