Hi Paul, On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:12:36 +0200 Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 15:23 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > > > +config HAVE_AT91_GENERATED > > + bool > > This will always be 'n'. > > > --- a/drivers/clk/at91/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/Makefile > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_AT91_GENERATED) += clk-generated.o > > And clk-generated.o will never be built. > > I think your options are to use > config HAVE_AT91_GENERATED > def_bool y > > or > config HAVE_AT91_GENERATED > bool "Yadda yadda yadda" > > or add > select HAVE_AT91_GENERATED > > somewhere (possibly even in a second patch). But as it stands the patch > looks like an elaborate NOP. I guess it will be selected by platforms embedding such clks. We just have to wait for those platform to reach mainline ;-). Best Regards, Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/