* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:26:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > I really think you're making that expedited nonsense far too accessible.
> >
> > This has nothing to do with accessibility and everything to do with
> > robustness. And with me not becoming the triage center for too many
> > non-RCU
> > bugs.
>
> But by making it so you're rewarding abuse instead of flagging it :-(
Btw., being a 'triage center' is the bane of APIs that are overly successful,
so we should take that burden with pride! :-)
Lockdep (and the scheduler APIs as well) frequently got into such situations as
well, and we mostly solved it by being more informative with debug splats.
I don't think a kernel API should (ever!) stay artificially silent, just for
fear
of flagging too many problems in other code.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
