Hi Will,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Thanks for looking at this! I'm fine with the general idea, but obviously
> the first patch needs an Ack from a devicetree person.
Yeah, sure. I was looking into a simple solution that does not require
to rewrite all the callers. Lets see what the device-tree maintainers
think about it :)
> > out_put_masters:
> > +
> > + of_free_phandle_args(masterspec);
>
> Shouldn't we also free the masterspec on success?
Right, thanks. This code is only the error path. I'll add this in the
next version.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
