Prevent tight loop for suspend-resume when some
devices failed to suspend
If some devices failed to suspend, we monitor this
error in try_to_suspend(). pm_suspend() is already
an 'int' returning function, how about checking return
from pm_suspend() before queueing suspend again?

For devices which do not register for pending events,
this will prevent tight loop for suspend-resume in
suspend abort scenarios due to device suspend failures

Signed-off-by: Nitish Ambastha <[email protected]>
---
v2: Rearranged code to make wait entry shared with
    existing one as suggested by Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
    Corrected log level from pr_info to pr_err for failure log
    Added return check for hibernate()

 kernel/power/autosleep.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/autosleep.c b/kernel/power/autosleep.c
index 9012ecf..1a86698 100644
--- a/kernel/power/autosleep.c
+++ b/kernel/power/autosleep.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ static struct wakeup_source *autosleep_ws;
 static void try_to_suspend(struct work_struct *work)
 {
        unsigned int initial_count, final_count;
+       int error = 0;
 
        if (!pm_get_wakeup_count(&initial_count, true))
                goto out;
@@ -43,22 +44,30 @@ static void try_to_suspend(struct work_struct *work)
                return;
        }
        if (autosleep_state >= PM_SUSPEND_MAX)
-               hibernate();
+               error = hibernate();
        else
-               pm_suspend(autosleep_state);
+               error = pm_suspend(autosleep_state);
 
        mutex_unlock(&autosleep_lock);
 
+       if (error) {
+               pr_err("PM: suspend returned (%d)\n", error);
+               goto wait;
+       }
+
        if (!pm_get_wakeup_count(&final_count, false))
                goto out;
 
+       if (final_count != initial_count)
+               goto out;
+
+ wait:
        /*
-        * If the wakeup occured for an unknown reason, wait to prevent the
-        * system from trying to suspend and waking up in a tight loop.
+        * If some devices failed to suspend or if the wakeup ocurred
+        * for an unknown reason, wait to prevent the system from
+        * trying to suspend and waking up in a tight loop.
         */
-       if (final_count == initial_count)
-               schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ / 2);
-
+       schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ / 2);
  out:
        queue_up_suspend_work();
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to