On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:12:20AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Peter.
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Agreed, luckily we already have the infrastructure for this, something
> > like so?
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
> > @@ -287,6 +287,16 @@ do {
> > \
> > preempt_enable(); \
> > } while (0)
> >
> > +#define per_cpu_sum(var) \
> > +({ \
> > + typeof(var) __sum = 0; \
> > + int cpu; \
>
> Why not __cpu?
I've no idea, __cpu is indeed more consistent, consider it changed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
