On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.stras...@ti.com> wrote:
> Now nothing prevents GPIO driver from being unloaded if its gpios
> were requested as GPIO IRQs only (without calling gpio_request()).
>
> Hence, add calls of try_module_get()/module_put() into
> gpiochip_irq_reqres/relres() to track such scenario properly.
Bad things could happen indeed.
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acour...@nvidia.com>
>
> Cc: Johan Hovold <jo...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index be42ab3..9b1d247 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -522,10 +522,14 @@ static int gpiochip_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>
> + if (!try_module_get(chip->owner))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> if (gpiochip_lock_as_irq(chip, d->hwirq)) {
> chip_err(chip,
> "unable to lock HW IRQ %lu for IRQ\n",
> d->hwirq);
> + module_put(chip->owner);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> return 0;
> @@ -536,6 +540,7 @@ static void gpiochip_irq_relres(struct irq_data *d)
> struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>
> gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(chip, d->hwirq);
> + module_put(chip->owner);
> }
>
> static int gpiochip_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> --
> 2.4.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
