On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:33:46PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S        | 63 
> +++++++++++-----------------------------
>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S |  5 ++++
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> index ce2c9049abef..08a37ec049f0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -508,7 +508,16 @@ END(irq_entries_start)
>  
>       testb   $3, CS(%rsp)
>       jz      1f
> +
> +     /*
> +      * IRQ from user mode.  Switch to kernel gsbase and inform context
> +      * tracking that we're in kernel mode.
> +      */
>       SWAPGS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING
> +     call enter_from_user_mode
> +#endif

I think you can make this much cleaner by getting rid of the ifdeffery
and pushing it into the enter_from_user_mode() function:

__visible void enter_from_user_mode(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING

        ...

#endif
}

The disadvantage of all that cleanliness is that we get one dumb

        call enter_from_user_mode

there to this abomination:

ffffffff810014f0 <enter_from_user_mode>:
ffffffff810014f0:       e8 db 97 67 00          callq  ffffffff8167acd0 
<__fentry__>
ffffffff810014f5:       55                      push   %rbp
ffffffff810014f6:       48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
ffffffff810014f9:       5d                      pop    %rbp
ffffffff810014fa:       c3                      retq   
ffffffff810014fb:       0f 1f 44 00 00          nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)

which sux.

We sure could use LTO here.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to