On 07/07/2015 09:10, Eric Auger wrote: > On 07/06/2015 07:41 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 06/07/2015 19:09, Eric Auger wrote: >>>>> The good thing is that this helps a bit forming a lock hierarchy across >>>>> the subsystems, for example irq bypass mutex outside vfio_platform_irq >>>>> spinlock, because you cannot have a spinlock inside the mutex. I think >>>>> that all of your six callbacks are fine. >>> arghh, no that's wrong then. I have plenty of them in the KVM/arm vgic >>> part :-( >> >> I checked and it's right... >> >> /me rereads >> >> AAAARGH. You cannot have a mutex inside a spinlock. What you're doing >> is fine. > > Sweated up (+ heat wave in France).
Same here, I also can blame the heat wave for the mistakes. :) Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
