Well, sorry for noise. Let me repeat that I agree with this change, but...
On 07/07, Andrew Morton wrote: > > From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> > Subject: kmod: remove unecessary explicit wide CPU affinity setting > > Not only useless it even breaks nohz full. The housekeeping work (general > kernel internal code that user doesn't care much about) is handled by a > reduced set of CPUs in nohz full, precisely those that are not included by > nohz_full= kernel parameters. For example unbound workqueues are handled > by housekeeping CPUs. I still think this part of the changelog looks confusing and just wrong. It is not that it breaks nohz full, unbound workqueues have nothing to do with housekeeping_mask from the kernel pov. But yes, people can change ->cpumask and this can connect to housekeeping_mask. Frederic, may I ask you to update the changelog? Although perhaps it was just me who was confused... Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/