4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oliver Hartkopp <socket...@hartkopp.net>

commit 36c01245eb8046c16eee6431e7dbfbb302635fa8 upstream.

As reported by Manfred Schlaegl here

   http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=143482089824232&w=2

commit 514ac99c64b "can: fix multiple delivery of a single CAN frame for
overlapping CAN filters" requires the skb->tstamp to be set to check for
identical CAN skbs.

As net timestamping is influenced by several players (netstamp_needed and
netdev_tstamp_prequeue) Manfred missed a proper timestamp which leads to
CAN frame loss.

As skb timestamping became now mandatory for CAN related skbs this patch
makes sure that received CAN skbs always have a proper timestamp set.
Maybe there's a better solution in the future but this patch fixes the
CAN frame loss so far.

Reported-by: Manfred Schlaegl <manfred.schla...@gmx.at>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socket...@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <m...@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/net/can/dev.c   |    5 +++++
 drivers/net/can/slcan.c |    1 +
 drivers/net/can/vcan.c  |    3 +++
 net/can/af_can.c        |    6 +++++-
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/can/dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/dev.c
@@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ unsigned int can_get_echo_skb(struct net
                struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
                u8 dlc = cf->can_dlc;
 
+               if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64))
+                       __net_timestamp(skb);
+
                netif_rx(priv->echo_skb[idx]);
                priv->echo_skb[idx] = NULL;
 
@@ -575,6 +578,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_can_skb(struct net
        if (unlikely(!skb))
                return NULL;
 
+       __net_timestamp(skb);
        skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CAN);
        skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
        skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
@@ -603,6 +607,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_canfd_skb(struct n
        if (unlikely(!skb))
                return NULL;
 
+       __net_timestamp(skb);
        skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CANFD);
        skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
        skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
--- a/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ static void slc_bump(struct slcan *sl)
        if (!skb)
                return;
 
+       __net_timestamp(skb);
        skb->dev = sl->dev;
        skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CAN);
        skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
--- a/drivers/net/can/vcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/vcan.c
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ static void vcan_rx(struct sk_buff *skb,
        skb->dev       = dev;
        skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
 
+       if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64))
+               __net_timestamp(skb);
+
        netif_rx_ni(skb);
 }
 
--- a/net/can/af_can.c
+++ b/net/can/af_can.c
@@ -310,8 +310,12 @@ int can_send(struct sk_buff *skb, int lo
                return err;
        }
 
-       if (newskb)
+       if (newskb) {
+               if (!(newskb->tstamp.tv64))
+                       __net_timestamp(newskb);
+
                netif_rx_ni(newskb);
+       }
 
        /* update statistics */
        can_stats.tx_frames++;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to