On 2015-07-05 19:08, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> Allow a nested hypervisor to single step its guests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mihai.do...@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> This patch applies on top of current linux-next.
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> index da772ed..9299ae5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
> #define CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING 0x00800000
> #define CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING 0x01000000
> #define CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS 0x02000000
> +#define CPU_BASED_MONITOR_TRAP_FLAG 0x08000000
> #define CPU_BASED_USE_MSR_BITMAPS 0x10000000
> #define CPU_BASED_MONITOR_EXITING 0x20000000
> #define CPU_BASED_PAUSE_EXITING 0x40000000
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h
> index 1fe9218..37fee27 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
> #define EXIT_REASON_INVALID_STATE 33
> #define EXIT_REASON_MSR_LOAD_FAIL 34
> #define EXIT_REASON_MWAIT_INSTRUCTION 36
> +#define EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_TRAP_FLAG 37
> #define EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_INSTRUCTION 39
> #define EXIT_REASON_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION 40
> #define EXIT_REASON_MCE_DURING_VMENTRY 41
> @@ -106,6 +107,7 @@
> { EXIT_REASON_MSR_READ, "MSR_READ" }, \
> { EXIT_REASON_MSR_WRITE, "MSR_WRITE" }, \
> { EXIT_REASON_MWAIT_INSTRUCTION, "MWAIT_INSTRUCTION" }, \
> + { EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_TRAP_FLAG, "MONITOR_TRAP_FLAG" }, \
> { EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_INSTRUCTION, "MONITOR_INSTRUCTION" }, \
> { EXIT_REASON_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION, "PAUSE_INSTRUCTION" }, \
> { EXIT_REASON_MCE_DURING_VMENTRY, "MCE_DURING_VMENTRY" }, \
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index e856dd5..6d7c650 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -2443,7 +2443,7 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx
> *vmx)
> CPU_BASED_CR8_LOAD_EXITING | CPU_BASED_CR8_STORE_EXITING |
> #endif
> CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING | CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING |
> - CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS | CPU_BASED_MONITOR_EXITING |
> + CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS | CPU_BASED_MONITOR_TRAP_FLAG |
> CPU_BASED_MONITOR_EXITING |
Overlong line.
> CPU_BASED_RDPMC_EXITING | CPU_BASED_RDTSC_EXITING |
> CPU_BASED_PAUSE_EXITING | CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW |
> CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS;
> @@ -6246,6 +6246,11 @@ static int handle_mwait(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return handle_nop(vcpu);
> }
>
> +static int handle_monitor_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int handle_monitor(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> printk_once(KERN_WARNING "kvm: MONITOR instruction emulated as NOP!\n");
> @@ -7282,6 +7287,7 @@ static int (*const kvm_vmx_exit_handlers[])(struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu) = {
> [EXIT_REASON_EPT_MISCONFIG] = handle_ept_misconfig,
> [EXIT_REASON_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION] = handle_pause,
> [EXIT_REASON_MWAIT_INSTRUCTION] = handle_mwait,
> + [EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_TRAP_FLAG] = handle_monitor_trap,
> [EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_INSTRUCTION] = handle_monitor,
> [EXIT_REASON_INVEPT] = handle_invept,
> [EXIT_REASON_INVVPID] = handle_invvpid,
> @@ -7542,6 +7548,8 @@ static bool nested_vmx_exit_handled(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu)
> return true;
> case EXIT_REASON_MWAIT_INSTRUCTION:
> return nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_MWAIT_EXITING);
> + case EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_TRAP_FLAG:
> + return nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_MONITOR_TRAP_FLAG);
> case EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_INSTRUCTION:
> return nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_MONITOR_EXITING);
> case EXIT_REASON_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION:
>
Looks OK otherwise. If you fix up the style thing, you may add my
Reviewed-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
