On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Brian Gerst <brge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Move the userspace accesses down into the common function in >> preparation for the next set of patches. >> > > One thing I don't like about the current code that makes these patches > harder to review is the bizarre approach to copying. If you changed > this: > >> - tmp = copy_vm86_regs_from_user(&info.regs, &v86->regs, >> - offsetof(struct kernel_vm86_struct, >> vm86plus) - >> - sizeof(info.regs)); > > into a normal field-by-field get_user / copy_from_user (the latter for > the big regs struct) then it would be clear what the ABI is and it > would be much easier to read the patches and confirm that you aren't > accidentally changing the ABI. > > You could also get rid of the constraint that certain fields in > apparently kernel-internal structs had to be in a certain order. > > Other than that, patches 1-4 look good on cursory inspection. I'll > look more carefully later. I need to think about patch 5 more. > > --Andy
Any other comments before I start working on v2? -- Brian Gerst -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/