> On July 13, 2015 at 8:27 PM Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> > wrote:
> > So I think the original patch makes sense (and I already applied it), > > we want known-simple and performance critical methods (such as atomic > > ops) always inlined. > > I will send more such force-inlining patches your way then. Now? We discuss this a month back or so? :-) Anyway, if so I prefer to group the patchset in at least two patches to simplify review: - performance criticial group - inline assembler group The former group contains all inline critical functions and the later to identify functions where gcc has problems because their inline heuristic for asm code is a toy. Hagen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
