On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <[email protected]> wrote: >> On July 13, 2015 at 8:27 PM Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> >> wrote: > >> > So I think the original patch makes sense (and I already applied it), >> > we want known-simple and performance critical methods (such as atomic >> > ops) always inlined. >> >> I will send more such force-inlining patches your way then. > > Now? We discuss this a month back or so? :-)
Not *your* way. I meant that I'll send patches to Ingo - I see that he agrees that this worth fixing instead of waiting for a better compiler. (Ideally, the compiler shouldn't do this, but gcc BZ comments are not encouraging). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
