On 07/11/2015 12:07 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
W dniu 11.07.2015 o 08:33, Stephen Boyd pisze:
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
index 0117238391d6..f38a6c49f744 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
* clock framework for Samsung platforms.
*/
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/clkdev.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
index b775fc29caa5..aa872d2c5105 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
@@ -13,10 +13,11 @@
#ifndef __SAMSUNG_CLK_H
#define __SAMSUNG_CLK_H
-#include <linux/clkdev.h>
#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include "clk-pll.h"
+struct clk;
+
Hmmm... why? Including clk-provider (which declares struct clk in your
last patch) is not sufficient?
I hope to eventually remove the forward declaration of struct clk in
clk-provider.h too. That will take some more time though. I can leave
this part out of the patch if you like and add it back when that work is
done, it doesn't matter to me.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
