On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:50:37 +0200
Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de> wrote:
> Thomas Graf <tg...@suug.ch> wrote:
> > On 07/13/15 at 10:11pm, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > Caused by:
> > >
> > > commit 21e4902aea80ef35afc00ee8d2abdea4f519b7f7
> > > Author: Thomas Graf <tg...@suug.ch>
> > > Date: Fri Jan 2 23:00:22 2015 +0100
> > >
> > > netlink: Lockless lookup with RCU grace period in socket release
> > >
> > > Defers the release of the socket reference using call_rcu() to
> > > allow using an RCU read-side protected call to rhashtable_lookup()
> > >
> > > This restores behaviour and performance gains as previously
> > > introduced by e341694 ("netlink: Convert netlink_lookup() to use
> > > RCU protected hash table") without the side effect of severely
> > > delayed socket destruction.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tg...@suug.ch>
> > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
> > >
> > >
> > > We can't hold mutex lock in a rcu callback, perhaps we could
> > > defer the mmap ring cleanup to a workqueue.
> >
> > The socket should be dead at this point. It might be simpler to
> > add a netlink_release_ring() function which doesn't require
> > locking at all. It would also get rid of all the special handling
> > for closing vs. non-closing.
>
> Do you know of any users of mmap'd netlink?
> Support for this was never added to libmnl; given the fact that netlink
> mmap doesn't have any advantages vs. socket interface i'd just revert it
> (or mark CONFIG_NETLINK_MMAP broken -- although I don't see
> how the unconditional copy on tx could ever be avoided).
We use netlink mmap because it gives slightly better performance
when processing a route flap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
