On Monday, July 13, 2015 07:58:59 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 10-07-15, 14:36, Pan Xinhui wrote: > > > > As policy->cpu may not be same in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init and > > acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit. There is a risk that we use different *cpu* to > > un/register acpi performance. So acpi_processor_unregister_performance > > may not be able to do the cleanup work. That causes a memory leak. And > > if there will be another acpi_processor_register_performance call, it > > may also fail thanks to the internal check of pr->performace. > > > > So we add a field *acpi_perf_cpu* to fix this issue. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix....@intel.com> > > --- > > Change from V1: > > comments update > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 4 +++- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
Patch queued up for 4.3, thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
