On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 02:54:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:47:47 +0530 Sudip Mukherjee > <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So an appropriate fix for this would be to move the references to > prev_kprobe/kprobe_ctlblk out of include/linux/kprobes.h and into > asm/kprobes.h. Presumably via include/asm-generic/kprobes.h in some > fashion. > > Have you tested this patch on mn10300? Does kprobes actually work on > mn10300? Perhaps not, and the solution here is to disable kprobes on > that arch until someone fixes it all up. No, this was not tested on board. :( I tried my best to get a board but it seems board sellers in India have not even heard the name of "mn10300". I tried contacting Koichi Yasutake (one of the maintainer of mn10300) in hope of getting/buying a board, but email of Koichi Yasutake is bouncing. I tried to contact the company about one of their board and the following is their reply: "As you say, linux runs on MN103E0700. But MN103E0700 is now EOL, so we need not to maintenace linux." :( > > > Please resend any mn10300 fixes which you still have pending. Should i resend as it is or should i fix according to your suggestion? or since this is arch specific changes and not tested on board so if you want it can be dropped also.
> Please be a bit more sparing in the cc's when doing so ;) yes, cc became a long list but it was also improper to send some part of the series to few maintainer and other to some other maintainers. regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
