On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:32:21AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> @@ -158,9 +140,7 @@ void arch_spin_lock_flags(arch_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned 
> long flags)
>  
>  static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
> -     SYNC_IO;
> -     __asm__ __volatile__("# arch_spin_unlock\n\t"
> -                             PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER: : :"memory");
> +     smp_mb();
>       lock->slock = 0;
>  }

Should we then also make smp_store_release() use sync instead of lwsync
to keep it consistent?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to