Hi,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 09:27:32AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
> > > index 5867384..f7d9ffd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
> > > @@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static void omap2_mcspi_set_enable(const struct
> > > spi_device *spi, int enable)
> > >
> > > static void omap2_mcspi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable)
> > > {
> > > + struct omap2_mcspi *mcspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
> > > u32 l;
> > >
> > > /* The controller handles the inverted chip selects
> > > @@ -255,6 +256,8 @@ static void omap2_mcspi_set_cs(struct spi_device
> > > *spi, bool enable)
> > > enable = !enable;
> > >
> > > if (spi->controller_state) {
> > > + pm_runtime_get_sync(mcspi->dev);
> > > +
> >
> > Should the return code should be checked here as with the other
> > instances of pm_runtime_get_sync?Yes. If it fails, the line fetch error would be triggered again. Probably the set_cs callback should also be changed, so that it can return an error code. This is not something for 4.2-rc, though. > Anyway, what do you think about adding gcc macro for pm_runtime_get_sync > function which report compiler warning when return value is not checked? Adding __must_check to pm_runtime_get_sync() should be discussed separately with the relevant people in Cc. A quick grep in drivers/ reveals a huge amount of code not handling pm_runtime_get_sync's return code. -- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
