On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 10:11 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 07:24:46AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > WORK_CPU_UNBOUND work items queued to a bound workqueue always run
> > locally. This is a good thing normally, but not when the user has
>
> The constant name used there is a bit misleading but you can't put
> work items which are queued w/ queue_work() on foreign cpus by
> default. queue_work() has always guaranteed local execution. The
> problem is that workqueue can't currently tell whether a queue_work()
> user expects cpu locality for correctness or optimization. It'd be
> great if we introduce queue_work_on_local() or sth and replace
> correctness ones with it but that involves auditing each and every
> queue_work() usage. If anybody is up for the task, I'd be happy to
> help.
Oh well. That puts a big dent in the utility of wq_unbound_cpumask, but
too bad. If someone has a big enough HPC itch, they'll scratch it.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
