On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:05 PM, <ji...@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> wrote: > > Octavian Purdila writes: >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila >> <octavian.purd...@intel.com> wrote: >>> >>> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have >>> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so >>> change all driver's checks accordingly. >>> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree >>> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch >>> above. >>> [1] >>> http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purd...@intel.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> >> >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that >> Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed? >> Thanks, >> Tavi > > Hi Tavi, > This is fine, but is there a particular rush to get it in? > Otherwise I'll just take it through the IIO tree. > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <ji...@kernel.org>
Hi Jonathan, Didn't mean to rush things, I haven't seen any activity on this for some time and thought it was forgotten. I was also confused with the status of Mika's patch, but now that I learned it was merged in 4.2, its clear to me that this patch needs to go through the IIO tree. Thanks, Tavi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
