On 23/07/15 15:38, Octavian Purdila wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:05 PM, <ji...@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Octavian Purdila writes: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila >>> <octavian.purd...@intel.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have >>>> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so >>>> change all driver's checks accordingly. >>>> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree >>>> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch >>>> above. >>>> [1] >>>> http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purd...@intel.com> >>>> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> >>> >>> >>> Hi Jonathan, >>> Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that >>> Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed? >>> Thanks, >>> Tavi >> >> Hi Tavi, >> This is fine, but is there a particular rush to get it in? >> Otherwise I'll just take it through the IIO tree. >> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <ji...@kernel.org> > > Hi Jonathan, > > Didn't mean to rush things, I haven't seen any activity on this for > some time and thought it was forgotten. A not entirely false assumption. I'd marked it in my email as to be applied then it got buried. oops and sorry about that. > I was also confused with the > status of Mika's patch, but now that I learned it was merged in 4.2, > its clear to me that this patch needs to go through the IIO tree. > Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out as testing for autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks, Jonathan > Thanks, > Tavi > A -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
