Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > 2015-07-24 20:04 GMT+09:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > <b.zolnier...@samsung.com>: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Friday, July 24, 2015 03:34:55 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> Dear Kukjin, > >> > >> Previously you did not picked up the fix for cpufreq memory leak. > >> I am sending it again with respective acks from LKML. Also another > >> minor improvement in the set. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Krzysztof > >> > >> > >> The following changes since commit > >> 1c4c7159ed2468f3ac4ce5a7f08d79663d381a93: > >> > >> Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 > (2015-07-05 16:24:54 -0700) > >> > >> are available in the git repository at: > >> > >> > >> https://github.com/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-fixes-non-critical-v4.3-2 > >> > >> for you to fetch changes up to 434213f727c12fab8657c8db3d23da4b0463365d: > >> > >> video: fbdev: s3c-fb: Constify platform_device_id (2015-07-24 15:17:32 > >> +0900) > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Improvements for Exynos boards: > >> 1. Fix memory leak in cpufreq error path. > >> 2. Constify platform_device_id in video/fbdev/s3c-fb. > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Krzysztof Kozlowski (1): > >> video: fbdev: s3c-fb: Constify platform_device_id > >> > >> Shailendra Verma (1): > >> cpufreq: exynos: Fix for memory leak in case SOC name does not match > > > > I would suggest merging this fix in v4.2 not v4.3: > > > > - it is obvious and touches only error paths > > Indeed, good point, thanks for pointing this. Although these are not > regressions for issues introduced in current release but they are are > non-intrusive. > > Kukjin, do you agree? Can you pull them for second round of v4.2 fixes (not > 4.3) > Agreed. OK.
> > - (hopefully) in v4.3 the exynos-cpufreq driver will be completely > > replaced by using cpufreq-dt for Exynos platforms (thus there will be > > no benefits of having this fix in v4.3 but there will be potential > > risk of merge conflicts due to exynos-cpufreq driver removal) > > > > We'll see... The Exynos 4x12 requires OPP patches. Are these ready for 4.3? > I think, if any conflicts based on fixes during -rc, can be handled by maintainer. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/