On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:12 -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com> > --- > net/openvswitch/vport.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/vport.c b/net/openvswitch/vport.c > index d14f594..baa018f 100644 > --- a/net/openvswitch/vport.c > +++ b/net/openvswitch/vport.c > @@ -475,6 +475,9 @@ void ovs_vport_receive(struct vport *vport, struct > sk_buff *skb, > struct sw_flow_key key; > int error; > > + if (!skb->sk || (sock_net(skb->sk) != read_pnet(&vport->dp > ->net))) > + skb_scrub_packet(skb, true); > + > stats = this_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats); > u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp); > stats->rx_packets++;
In general, this shouldn't be necessary as the packet should already be scrubbed before they arrive here. Could you maybe add a WARN_ON and check how those skbs with conntrack data traverse the stack? I also didn't understand why make it dependent on the socket. Thanks, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
