Hi, On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Knut Petersen wrote:
> I added the multiply back because gcc (v. 3.3.4) does generate the fastest > code > if I write it this way. The multiply is not generally faster, so your version may be the fastest, but in other situations it will be a lot slower. My version is generally fast. > The special case for s_pitch == 2 saves about 270 ms system time (2120 -> > 1850ms) > with a 16x30 font. Compared to what? How much is the function call overhead? > It´s as fast/slow as your previous version, the measurements are almost > identical. The generated code is a bit smaller, so it mostly depends on the icache to see a difference. bye, Roman
