On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Now just agree with me that mbox_request_chan() should fail on request > of a known bad configuration request and I can code all this up and > re-submit. :D > You make me look like a jerk :( My problem is not with validation as such. I see problem in the way you implement that makes validation necessary. I'll explain step-by-step in the driver post. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add generic mechanism for testing M... Jassi Brar
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add generic mechanism for test... Lee Jones
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add generic mechanism for ... Jassi Brar
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add generic mechanism ... Lee Jones
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add generic mechan... Jassi Brar
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add generic m... Lee Jones
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add gener... Jassi Brar
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add g... Lee Jones
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add g... Jassi Brar
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add g... Lee Jones
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add g... Jassi Brar
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mailbox: Add g... Lee Jones