On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:26AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver has an OF id table but the .of_match_table is not set so
> the SPI core can't do an OF style match and the table was unused.
>
Is an OF style match necessary?
I have been using devicetree and it matches based on the .id_table.
Couldn't we just remove the mcp320x_dt_ids table instead?
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c b/drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c
> index b19e4f9d16e0..41a21e986c1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, mcp320x_id);
> static struct spi_driver mcp320x_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "mcp320x",
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mcp320x_dt_ids),
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> },
> .probe = mcp320x_probe,
> --
> 2.4.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
