2015-08-22 13:09 GMT+03:00 Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>: > > * Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:24:28PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:02:26PM +0100, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >> > > 2015-08-13 12:01 GMT+03:00 Will Deacon <[email protected]>: >> > > > Yes please, works for me! If we're targetting 4.3, then please can you >> > > > base >> > > > on 4.2-rc4, as that's what our current arm64 queue is using? >> > > > >> > > >> > > Does this mean that we are targeting arm64 part for 4.3 too? >> > >> > It depends on how well it merges with our current queue and whether it >> > holds up to regression testing. The patches have been reviewed, so I'm >> > comfortable with the content, but we're not at a stage where we can debug >> > and fix any failures that might crop up from the merge. >> >> Scratch that :( >> >> I tried this out under EFI and it dies horribly in the stub code because >> we're missing at least one KASAN_SANITIZE_ Makefile entry. >> >> So I think this needs longer to stew before hitting mainline. By all means >> get the x86 dependencies in for 4.3, but the arm64 port can probably use >> another cycle to iron out the bugs. > > Is there any known problem with the two patches in this series, or can I apply > them? >
None, as far as I know. BTW, the second patch was Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/11/546). I just forgot to add this into changelog. > Thanks, > > Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
