On 26/08/15 12:42, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:43:04AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Lukasz,
>>
>> On 26/08/15 08:04, Anaczkowski, Lukasz wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 3, 2015 8:26 PM
>>> Lukasz Anaczkowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> v2: Fixed ARM64 syntax error
>>>
>>> Hi Marc,
>>>
>>> Does this patch look ok now?
>
> No it does not, it seems to break arm64, I put together a fix
> below. I do not think the way you handle the count increment
> in acpi_parse_entries() is correct anyway, since you increment
> it only if max_entries != 0, which changes mainline behaviour.
Yeah, this is fundamentally flawed:
- count is only incremented when max_entries != 0, as you noticed
- With max_entries != 0, count now represent the sum of all matches
Is that expected?
- The proc iteration stops after the first match. Why?
- The test for max_entries is done inside the proc loop. Why?
I came up with the following patch that restores arm64 to a booting state.
If the intention was to change the meaning of the acpi_parse_entries
return value, then this should be documented and agreed upon.
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
index 1217e41..f06327f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
@@ -249,19 +249,24 @@ acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
while (((unsigned long)entry) + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) <
table_end) {
+ bool match = false;
+
+ if (max_entries && count >= max_entries)
+ break;
for (i = 0; i < proc_num; i++) {
if (entry->type != proc[i].id)
continue;
- if (max_entries && count++ >= max_entries)
- continue;
if (proc[i].handler(entry, table_end)) {
proc[i].count = -EINVAL;
return -EINVAL;
}
proc[i].count++;
- break;
+ match = true;
}
+ if (match)
+ count++;
+
/*
* If entry->length is 0, break from this loop to avoid
* infinite loop.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
