On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 01:35:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:43:16PM +0800, Henry Chen wrote:
> > The regmap_format will not be initialize if device driver not declare the
> > regmap_bus
> > when registering the regmap. To avoid the null function of format_val when
> > called regmap_bulk_read(). It need to give a format function when regmap
> > init.
>
> > Call trace:
> > [< (null)>] (null)
> > [<ffffffc0004cbdd0>] mtk_rtc_read_time+0x9c/0x134
> > [<ffffffc0004c9618>] __rtc_read_time.isra.3+0x40/0x7c
> > [<ffffffc0004c9688>] rtc_read_time+0x34/0x58
>
> Please don't paste entire backtraces in, they're enormous and tend to
> obscure the actual content while adding little value. If needed then
> edited highlights work better. I'm fairly sure I've mentioned this
> before...
>
> > @@ -783,8 +783,22 @@ struct regmap *regmap_init(struct device *dev,
> > map->defer_caching = true;
> > map->reg_write = _regmap_bus_raw_write;
> > }
> > +/*
> > + * For bulk read, need to hook the format function.
> > + */
> > +simple_format_initialization:
>
> The indentation is all messed up here, we're misssing a blank line and
> the comment is not indented.
>
> > -skip_format_initialization:
> > + switch (config->val_bits) {
> > + case 8:
> > + map->format.format_val = regmap_format_8;
> > + break;
> > + case 16:
> > + map->format.format_val = regmap_format_16_native;
> > + break;
> > + case 32:
> > + map->format.format_val = regmap_format_32_native;
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> Why are these format functions sensible? Converting a null pointer
> dereference into data corruption wouldn't be ideal. The commit message
> should really cover this.
The regmap_bulk_read() function worked before the following patch:
15b8d2c41fe5 (regmap: Fix regmap_bulk_read in BE mode)
As far as I can see this patch fixes this issue by using simple format
functions. Before the above mentioned patch, the code used memcpy. Now
regmap_format_*_native is used which should result in the same behaviour
but fixes the null pointer.
I am not sure if there are other locations in the code where format_val
is used in this setup so I don't know if this would change behavior in a
different codepath.
Best regards,
Markus
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
