On 27 August 2015 at 18:50, Jason Low <jason.l...@hp.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 13:21 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3 August 2015 at 11:55, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Since commit d4573c3e1c99 ("sched: Improve load balancing in the presence
>> > of idle CPUs"), the ILB CPU starts with the idle load balancing of other
>> > idle CPUs and finishes with itself in order to speed up the spread of tasks
>> > in all idle CPUs.
>> >
>> > The this_rq->next_balance is still used in nohz_idle_balance as an
>> > intermediate step to gather the shortest next balance before updating
>> > nohz.next_balance. But the former has not been updated yet and is likely to
>> > be set with the current jiffies. As a result, the nohz.next_balance will be
>> > set with current jiffies instead of the real next balance date. This
>> > generates spurious kicks of nohz ilde balance.
>> >
>> > nohz_idle_balance must set the nohz.next_balance without taking into
>> > account this_rq->next_balance which is not updated yet. Then, this_rq will
>> > update nohz.next_update with its next_balance once updated and if
>> > necessary.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org>
>
> Acked-by: Jason Low <jason.l...@hp.com>
Thanks
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
