> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Yaniv Gardi <yga...@codeaurora.org>
> wrote:
>> This change turns the UFS variant (SCSI_UFS_QCOM) into a UFS
>> a platform device.
>> In order to do so a few additional changes are required:
>> 1. The ufshcd-pltfrm is no longer serves as a platform device.
>> Now it only serves as a group of platform APIs such as PM APIs
>> (runtime suspend/resume, system suspend/resume etc), parsers of
>> clocks, regulators and pm_levels from DT.
>> 2. What used to be the old platform "probe" is now "only"
>> a pltfrm_init() routine, that does exactly the same, but only
>> being called by the new probe function of the UFS variant.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <yga...@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt | 2 +-
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 78
>> +++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c | 92
>> ++++++----------------
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.h | 41 ++++++++++
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 10 +++
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 1 +
>> 6 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.h
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
>> index 5357919..b39e765 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ UFSHC nodes are defined to describe on-chip UFS host
>> controllers.
>> Each UFS controller instance should have its own node.
>>
>> Required properties:
>> -- compatible : compatible list, contains "jedec,ufs-1.1"
>> +- compatible : compatible list, contains "jedec,ufs-1.1" or
>> "qcom,ufshc"
>
> Replying again as I inadvertently dropped everyone.
>
> This should also have a more specific compatible string with the SOC
> name/number in it. It may be "the same in all SOCs", but there is
> always the possibility for bugs/limitations to be found that are
> specific to an SOC even if all RTL versions are identical (e.g.
> different max clock speeds). It is about making the dtb future proof,
> not about what exactly you need today. You can keep qcom,ufshc for
> driver matching if you want.
I see your point.
I just would like to make sure, syntactically speaking, if what you mean
should look like:
compatible : compatible list, contains "jedec,ufs-1.1" or
"qcom,ufshc" for msm8994, msm8996 SOCs.
>
>> - interrupts : <interrupt mapping for UFS host controller IRQ>
>> - reg : <registers mapping>
>
> What about phy properties? No Unipro PHY block that requires setup?
>
yes, i will add another documentation file for it.
> Rob
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
