Hi

perf tools has a copy of the x86 instruction decoder for decoding
Intel PT.  This patch set adds a perf tools test to use it to
test new instructions.  Subsequent patches add a few new x86
instructions, or very slightly modify them in the case of MPX.
Those changes affect both perf tools and x86/insn.

I suggest Arnaldo takes all these patches as they mainly affect
perf tools, at least in terms of lines-of-code.


Adrian Hunter (4):
      perf tools: Add a test for decoding of new x86 instructions
      x86/insn: perf tools: Pedantically tweak opcode map for MPX instructions
      x86/insn: perf tools: Add new SHA instructions
      x86/insn: perf tools: Add new memory instructions

 arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt                    |  19 +-
 tools/perf/tests/Build                             |   3 +
 tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c                    |   8 +
 tools/perf/tests/gen-insn-x86-dat.awk              |  75 ++
 tools/perf/tests/gen-insn-x86-dat.sh               |  43 ++
 tools/perf/tests/insn-x86-dat-32.c                 | 640 ++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/tests/insn-x86-dat-64.c                 | 738 ++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/tests/insn-x86-dat-src.c                | 835 +++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/tests/insn-x86.c                        | 180 +++++
 tools/perf/tests/tests.h                           |   1 +
 .../perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/x86-opcode-map.txt  |  19 +-
 11 files changed, 2553 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/gen-insn-x86-dat.awk
 create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/gen-insn-x86-dat.sh
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/insn-x86-dat-32.c
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/insn-x86-dat-64.c
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/insn-x86-dat-src.c
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/insn-x86.c


Regards
Adrian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to