Em Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 04:21:56AM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
> If both LIBBPF and DWARF are detected, it is possible to create prologue
> for eBPF programs to help them accessing kernel data. HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
> and CONFIG_BPF_PROLOGUE is added as flags for this feature.
>
> PERF_HAVE_ARCH_GET_REG_OFFSET indicates an architecture supports
> converting name of a register to its offset in 'struct pt_regs'.
> Without this support, BPF_PROLOGUE should be turned off.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangn...@huawei.com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com>
> Cc: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gr...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>
> Cc: He Kuang <heku...@huawei.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kaixu Xia <xiaka...@huawei.com>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl>
> Cc: Zefan Li <lize...@huawei.com>
> Cc: pi3or...@163.com
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
> Link:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/n/1436445342-1402-33-git-send-email-wangn...@huawei.com
> ---
> tools/perf/config/Makefile | 12 ++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/include/dwarf-regs.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> index 38a4144..d46765b7 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> @@ -314,6 +314,18 @@ ifndef NO_LIBELF
> CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
> $(call detected,CONFIG_LIBBPF)
> endif
> +
> + ifndef NO_DWARF
> + ifneq ($(origin PERF_HAVE_ARCH_GET_REG_INFO), undefined)
> + CFLAGS += -DHAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
> + $(call detected,CONFIG_BPF_PROLOGUE)
> + else
> + msg := $(warning BPF prologue is not supported by architecture
> $(ARCH));
Shouldn't this be replace to something like:
msg := $(warning BPF prologue is not supported by architecture $(ARCH),
missing ARCH_GET_REG_INFO);
Or even in lowercase?
> + endif
> + else
> + msg := $(warning DWARF support is off, BPF prologue is disabled);
> + endif
> +
> endif # NO_LIBBPF
> endif # NO_LIBELF
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/include/dwarf-regs.h
> b/tools/perf/util/include/dwarf-regs.h
> index 8f14965..3dda083 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/include/dwarf-regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/include/dwarf-regs.h
> @@ -5,4 +5,11 @@
> const char *get_arch_regstr(unsigned int n);
> #endif
Shouldn't this test against PERF_HAVE_ARCH_GET_REG_INFO instead? I.e.
is arch_get_reg_info() only allowed to work with eBPF? I guess not,
right?
> +#ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
> +/*
> + * Arch should support fetching the offset of a register in pt_regs
> + * by its name.
> + */
> +int arch_get_reg_info(const char *name, int *offset);
> +#endif
> #endif
> --
> 2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
