On 09/04/2015 06:14 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 9/4/2015 12:12 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney <david.da...@cavium.com>

It is perfectly legitimate for a PCI device to have an
PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value of zero.  This happens if the device doesn't
use interrupts, or on PCIe devices, where only MSI/MSI-X are
supported.

Silence the annoying "of_irq_parse_pci() failed with rc=-19" error
messages by making them conditional on !-ENODEV (which can only be
produced in the PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN == 0 case).

Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.da...@cavium.com>
---
  drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c b/drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c
index 1710d9d..33d242a 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c
@@ -106,7 +106,9 @@ int of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 
slot, u8 pin)

        ret = of_irq_parse_pci(dev, &oirq);
        if (ret) {
-               dev_err(&dev->dev, "of_irq_parse_pci() failed with rc=%d\n", 
ret);
+               if (ret != -ENODEV)
+                       dev_err(&dev->dev,
+                               "of_irq_parse_pci() failed with rc=%d\n", ret);
                return 0; /* Proper return code 0 == NO_IRQ */
        }



It is not safe to assume that the functions that of_irq_parse_pci() calls
will never be modified to return -ENODEV, thus resulting in of_irq_parse_pci()
returning -ENODEV for a reason other than PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN == 0.


Since the current implementation *only ever* returns -ENODEV for PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN == 0, we could just document that behavior, and not hack up the APIs by adding a second return channel from the function.

The additional change on top of my patch would be to add a comment describing this behavior.

David Daney.



A more robust solution would be something like:


(1) Change of_irq_parse_pci() to _of_irq_parse_pci(), adding an argument and
use it to report the case of PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN == 0.

static int _of_irq_parse_pci(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct of_phandle_args 
*out_irq, int *no_pin)
{

...
        *no_pin = 0;
...
        /* No pin, exit */
        if (pin == 0) {
                *no_pin = 1;
                return -ENODEV;
        }
...


int of_irq_parse_pci(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct of_phandle_args 
*out_irq)
{
        int no_pin;
        return _of_irq_parse_pci(pdev, out_irq, &no_pin)
}


(2) Then the fix to of_irq_parse_and_map_pci() would be:

   +     int no_pin;
        ret = of_irq_parse_pci(dev, &oirq, &no_pin);
        if (ret) {
-               dev_err(&dev->dev, "of_irq_parse_pci() failed with rc=%d\n", 
ret);
+               if (!no_pin)
+                       dev_err(&dev->dev,
+                               "of_irq_parse_pci() failed with rc=%d\n", ret);
                return 0; /* Proper return code 0 == NO_IRQ */
        }


I'm not sure I like my solution, there might be a better way.

I also noticed another bug while looking at of_irq_parse_pci().  It returns
the non-zero return value from pci_read_config_byte().  But that value is
one of the PCI function error values from include/linux/pci.h, such as:

    #define PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER     0x87

instead of a negative errno.


-Frank


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to