On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Shuah Khan <shua...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: > On 09/09/2015 10:45 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 09/09/2015 10:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> Re-ping. Can someone pull this into their tree? >>> >>> -Kees >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: >>>> This adds support for s390 to the seccomp selftests. Some improvements >>>> were made to enhance the accuracy of failure reporting, and additional >>>> tests were added to validate assumptions about the currently traced >>>> syscall. Also adds early asserts for running on older kernels to avoid >>>> noise when the seccomp syscall is not implemented. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> >>>> --- >> >> >> Sorry looks like it got lost in my LinuxCon backlog. I will queue it >> up for 4.3-rc1. >> > > Hmm. It doesn't apply to linux-kselftest next. Based on your comment > > "This applies on top of -next, following the addition of the powerpc > tests."
Well, it was -next when I sent it. :) The powerpc changes are now in Linus's tree, so there should be no problem. Is your linux-kselftest merged with 4.3-rc yet? -Kees > > This one probably should go through PowerPc tree. > > Adding Michael Ellerman to the thread,. Michael! Something > you can take in for 4.3-rc1?? > > thanks, > -- Shuah > > > > -- > Shuah Khan > Sr. Linux Kernel Developer > Open Source Innovation Group > Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) > shua...@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978 -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
