On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 10:23 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Shuah Khan <shua...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: > > On 09/09/2015 10:45 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: > >> On 09/09/2015 10:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: > >>>> This adds support for s390 to the seccomp selftests. Some improvements > >>>> were made to enhance the accuracy of failure reporting, and additional > >>>> tests were added to validate assumptions about the currently traced > >>>> syscall. Also adds early asserts for running on older kernels to avoid > >>>> noise when the seccomp syscall is not implemented. > >> > >> Sorry looks like it got lost in my LinuxCon backlog. I will queue it > >> up for 4.3-rc1. > > > > Hmm. It doesn't apply to linux-kselftest next. Based on your comment > > > > "This applies on top of -next, following the addition of the powerpc > > tests." > > Well, it was -next when I sent it. :) The powerpc changes are now in > Linus's tree, so there should be no problem. Is your linux-kselftest > merged with 4.3-rc yet?
Right, it applies cleanly to Linus' tree as of ~now (b8889c4fc6ba). So it should be fine to go via the selftest tree as a fix for rc1. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
