On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 10:27:57 AM Al Stone wrote: > On 09/16/2015 10:24 AM, Al Stone wrote: > > On 09/15/2015 08:44 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 03:13:12 PM Al Stone wrote: > >>> On 09/09/2015 03:09 PM, Al Stone wrote: > >>>> Currently, the BAD_MADT_ENTRY macro is used to do a very simple sanity > >>>> check on the various subtables that are defined for the MADT. The check > >>>> compares the size of the subtable data structure as defined by ACPICA to > >>>> the length entry in the subtable. If they are not the same, the > >>>> assumption > >>>> is that the subtable is incorrect. > >>>> > > [snip...] > > >> I'm going to apply this series if people have no problems with it. I do > >> think > >> it is slightly overkill, but then as long as it works ... > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Rafael > >> > > Would you prefer I send out the updated version with Sudeep's fix to apply > instead of this version?
Yes, I would. > Or have you picked that up already? No, I haven't. > Easily updated and sent out, if it'll make your life simpler.... Yes, please. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
