On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:27:52AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:59:57AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:51:22PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > static_key_enabled() can be used on struct static_key but not on its > > > wrapper types static_key_true and static_key_false. The function is > > > useful for debugging and management of static keys. Update it so that > > > it can be used for the wrapper types too. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > Hello, > > > > > > If this patch is acceptable, please let me know how it should be > > > routed. > > > > > > > Yeah, no problem with this, I'm assuming there's dependencies in the > > patches you didn't send me? > > Yeap, later patches add static_keys for testing whether a controller > is enabled and whether it's on the new or old hierarchy and management > path in cgroup core needs to index the keys and test them.
Ok, take it through you tree then, its a small enough patch. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
