Hi Axel,
Thanks for the patch

Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org>


I remember fixing this sometime back which was reported by static checker reported by Dan Carpenter, I forgot to send it over to wider audience. Thanks for reminding.


--srini
On 18/09/15 10:50, Axel Lin wrote:
It's pointless to test (cell->bit_offset || cell->bit_offset).
nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place() should be called when
(cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits).

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel....@ingics.com>
---
  drivers/nvmem/core.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index d3c6676..c39723a 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
                return rc;

        /* shift bits in-place */
-       if (cell->bit_offset || cell->bit_offset)
+       if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits)
                nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf);

        *len = cell->bytes;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to