Hi Axel, Thanks for the patch Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org>
I remember fixing this sometime back which was reported by static checker reported by Dan Carpenter, I forgot to send it over to wider audience. Thanks for reminding.
--srini On 18/09/15 10:50, Axel Lin wrote:
It's pointless to test (cell->bit_offset || cell->bit_offset). nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place() should be called when (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits). Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel....@ingics.com> --- drivers/nvmem/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c index d3c6676..c39723a 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c @@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, return rc; /* shift bits in-place */ - if (cell->bit_offset || cell->bit_offset) + if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits) nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf); *len = cell->bytes;
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/