Hi Steve,

On 21/09/15 16:02, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:26:23 +0100
> Kapileshwar Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> When a trace recorded on a 32-bit device is processed with a 64-bit
>> binary, the higher 32-bits of the address need to ignored
>>
>> The lack of this results in the output of the 64-bit pointer
>> value to the trace as the 32-bit address lookup fails in find_printk.
>>
>> Before:
>> burn-1778  [003]   548.600305: bputs:   0xc0046db2s: 2cec5c058d98c
>>
>> After:
>> burn-1778  [003]   548.600305: bputs:   0xc0046db2s: RT throttling activated
>>
>> The problem occurs in PRINT_FEILD when the field is recognized as a pointer
>> to a string (of the type const char *)
>>
>> Heterogeneous architectures cases below can arise and should be handled:
>>
>> * Traces recorded using 32-bit addresses processed on a 64-bit machine
>> * Traces recorded using 64-bit addresses processed on a 32-bit machine
>>
>> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Javi Merino <[email protected]>
>> Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
>> Reported-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Kapileshwar Singh <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c 
>> b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>> index cc25f059ab3d..e622d2efeccf 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>> @@ -3721,7 +3721,7 @@ static void print_str_arg(struct trace_seq *s, void 
>> *data, int size,
>>      struct format_field *field;
>>      struct printk_map *printk;
>>      long long val, fval;
>> -    unsigned long addr;
>> +    unsigned long long addr;
>>      char *str;
>>      unsigned char *hex;
>>      int print;
>> @@ -3754,13 +3754,31 @@ static void print_str_arg(struct trace_seq *s, void 
>> *data, int size,
>>               */
>>              if (!(field->flags & FIELD_IS_ARRAY) &&
>>                  field->size == pevent->long_size) {
>> -                    addr = *(unsigned long *)(data + field->offset);
>> +
>> +                    /* Handle heterogeneous recording and processing
>> +                     * architectures
>> +                     *
>> +                     * CASE I:
>> +                     * Traces recorded on 32-bit devices (32-bit
>> +                     * addressing) and processed on 64-bit devices:
>> +                     * In this case, the higher 32-bits of the address
>> +                     * need to be ignored.
> 
> I just re-read this, and realized that it's not quite accurate. It
> should say something like "In this case, only 32 bits should be read.",
> as the above describes more of Namhyung's version which was incorrect.

Will correct the comment and send an updated patch.

Regards, 
KP
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
>> +                     *
>> +                     * CASE II:
>> +                     * Traces recorded on 64 bit devices and processed
>> +                     * on 32-bit devices. In this case 64 bits must be
>> +                     * read.
>> +                     */
>> +                    addr = (pevent->long_size == 8) ?
>> +                            *(unsigned long long *)(data + field->offset) :
>> +                            (unsigned long long)*(unsigned int *)(data + 
>> field->offset);
>> +
>>                      /* Check if it matches a print format */
>>                      printk = find_printk(pevent, addr);
>>                      if (printk)
>>                              trace_seq_puts(s, printk->printk);
>>                      else
>> -                            trace_seq_printf(s, "%lx", addr);
>> +                            trace_seq_printf(s, "%llx", addr);
>>                      break;
>>              }
>>              str = malloc(len + 1);
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to