On 22/09/15 22:03, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 22/09/15 00:20, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Sudeep Holla wrote:
The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is used to identify the interrupts that should
be left enabled so as to allow them to work as expected during the
suspend-resume cycle, but doesn't guarantee that it will wake the system
>from a suspended state, enable_irq_wake is recommended to be used for
the wakeup.
This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with
enable_irq_wake instead.
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com>
---
drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c | 11 +++++++++--
drivers/mfd/ab8500-debugfs.c | 2 +-
drivers/mfd/ab8500-gpadc.c | 15 +++++++++++----
drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/power/ab8500_btemp.c | 6 ++++--
drivers/power/ab8500_charger.c | 6 ++++--
drivers/power/ab8500_fg.c | 9 ++++++---
drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c | 5 ++---
drivers/usb/phy/phy-ab8500-usb.c | 10 ++++++----
9 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Is there a reason for bundling the changes in all of these subsystems
together into a single patch?
No, I understand this needs to be split. Since I was not 100% confident
about this change, I wanted LinusW to review and provide feedback and
gets things working before I can split this changes. I must have added
RFC, but usually it gets ignored :)
Best if Linus reviews the correct patch-set. Please split and
resubmit.
Sure, but would like to get some feedback before I proceed just to
ensure my understanding is correct.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
