On 09/16/2015 02:00 PM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
Introduce is_via_compact_memory helper function indicating compacting
via /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory to improve readability.

Note that it can also be through single node, i.e.
/sys/devices/system/node/node0/compact

is_manual_compaction() would perhaps be better name

To catch this situation in __compaction_suitable, use order as parameter
directly instead of using struct compact_control.

That can be fixed as well. Remove the test from __compaction_suitable(),
and in compact_zone(), do something like:
  ret = is_manual_compaction() ? COMPACT_CONTINUE : compaction_suitable()

I think it's better since it's more explicit, but I understand others might feel differently.

This patch has no functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiao...@163.com>
---
  mm/compaction.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index c5c627a..a8e6593 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -1197,6 +1197,15 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct 
zone *zone,
        return cc->nr_migratepages ? ISOLATE_SUCCESS : ISOLATE_NONE;
  }

+/*
+ * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
+ * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
+ */
+static inline bool is_via_compact_memory(int order)
+{
+       return order == -1;
+}
+
  static int __compact_finished(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
                            const int migratetype)
  {
@@ -1223,11 +1232,7 @@ static int __compact_finished(struct zone *zone, struct 
compact_control *cc,
                return COMPACT_COMPLETE;
        }

-       /*
-        * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
-        * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
-        */
-       if (cc->order == -1)
+       if (is_via_compact_memory(cc->order))
                return COMPACT_CONTINUE;

        /* Compaction run is not finished if the watermark is not met */
@@ -1290,11 +1295,7 @@ static unsigned long __compaction_suitable(struct zone 
*zone, int order,
        int fragindex;
        unsigned long watermark;

-       /*
-        * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
-        * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
-        */
-       if (order == -1)
+       if (is_via_compact_memory(order))
                return COMPACT_CONTINUE;

        watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone);
@@ -1658,10 +1659,11 @@ static void __compact_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct 
compact_control *cc)
                 * this makes sure we compact the whole zone regardless of
                 * cached scanner positions.
                 */
-               if (cc->order == -1)
+               if (is_via_compact_memory(cc->order))
                        __reset_isolation_suitable(zone);

-               if (cc->order == -1 || !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order))
+               if (is_via_compact_memory(cc->order) ||
+                               !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order))
                        compact_zone(zone, cc);

                if (cc->order > 0) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to