On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 05:37:36PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> The current implementation hard codes the two supported channels so that
> "tx" is always 0 and "rx" is always 1. This is because there has been no
> suitable way in ACPI to name resources.
>
> With _DSD device properties we can finally do this:
>
> Device (SPI1) {
> Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () {
> ...
> FixedDMA (0x0000, 0x0000, Width32bit)
> FixedDMA (0x0001, 0x0001, Width32bit)
> })
>
> Name (_DSD, Package () {
> ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> Package () {
> Package () {"dma-names", Package () {"tx", "rx"}}
> },
> })
> }
>
> The names "tx" and "rx" now provide index of the FixedDMA resource in
> question.
>
> Modify acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_name() so that it looks for
> "dma-names" property first and only then fall back using hardcoded indices.
>
> The DT "dma-names" binding that we reuse for ACPI is documented in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt.
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.k...@intel.com>
This is actually good and will help a lot. Btw would like to see some
tested-by tags, perhaps on dw dma or idma...
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
