> Your approach finds a function definition. Yes. - I assumed that it might also be relevant.
> My approach works on the call directly, using whatever type information is > available. The connection between the SmPL specification "f(...)@e" and the desired return type was not obvious for me so far. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
