On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +     /*
> +      * Still have preempt_count() == 2, from:
> +      *
> +      *      schedule()
> +      *        preempt_disable();                    // 1
> +      *        __schedule()
> +      *          raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock)        // 2
> +      */
> +     rq = finish_task_switch(prev); /* drops rq->lock, preempt_count() == 1 
> */
>       balance_callback(rq);
> -     preempt_enable();
> +     preempt_enable(); /* preempt_count() == 0 */

Bah. I so hate tail comments. What's wrong with

+        /* preempt_count() ==> 0 */
        preempt_enable();

Hmm?

        tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to