On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:28:28AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > + if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off() && prev->state != TASK_DEAD)) {
> > __schedule_bug(prev);
> > + preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_DISABLED);
>
> That one would be a bit fragile if we kept PREEMPT_ACTIVE, but since we are
> removing
> it...
Right, let me move this patch after 7 (the one that stops setting
PREEMPT_ACTIVE).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
